This assault on the Qantas workforce was opened by Joyce’s grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011 during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. Mathew Mazzitelli v Qantas Airways Limited [2020] On 5 May 2020, an application was lodged with the Commission to deal with a JobKeeper dispute under Part 6-4C of the Fair Work Act. In other words, Qantas came out $1,500 in front and the worker $1,500 behind. A consortium of unions have lost an appeal in the Federal Court to have Qantas pay sick leave to the 25,000 workers who were temporarily stood down due to COVID-19. The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. The dispute between the airline and unions was around wages paid in arrears. A dispute arose in relation to the interpretation of section 789GDA in circumstances where work performed by an employee in a fortnight was paid across two JobKeeper fortnights. “Qantas management has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving $800 million in public funding. Read the Jobkeeper disputes benchbook online “Qantas has based all of its decisions on JobKeeper on the legislation and guidance provided by the ATO and made sure all employees receive a ‘safety net’ payment of $1500 per fortnight. Qantas faces a determined union campaign and a petition after notifying about 2000 workers yesterday that it will lay them off and move to outsource ground handling operations at 10 airports across Australia. A stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments. The Transport Workers’ Union is today lodging an urgent dispute in the Fair Work Commission over Qantas’ intent to rush through a redundancy process starting just two days before Christmas. They lost this argument initially and then on appeal (which also involved the ACTU). Qantas Group’s chief executive Alan Joyce, whose tenure with the airline has been extended to at least 2023, while thousands of workers lose theirs, received a staggering near $24 million. 26th Aug: Federal Court hearing for the above mentioned JobKeeper dispute. This benchbook has been prepared by staff of the Fair Work Commission to assist parties lodging or responding to jobkeeper dispute applications under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). CEPU v Qantas [2020] FCA 656. The Australian Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the $101 billion JobKeeper scheme. I moved to the US from China — here are the biggest cultural differences I've noticed between the 2 countries, Bath & Body Works is now a standalone company — we visited a store and saw why it's been L Brands' secret weapon, CBA and NAB pass on RBA interest rate cut in full, but ANZ and Westpac defy Treasurer Josh Frydenberg's orders, How to watch Netflix on your TV in 5 different ways, The incredible story of Ferrari's 72-year journey from an upstart racing team to a $27 billion luxury brand. In yet another major destruction of its workers’ jobs, Australia’s former government-owned airline Qantas announced last week that it will outsource ground crew work, including baggage handling, aircraft cleaning and bus services, at airports across the country at the cost of 2,500 permanent jobs. This arose as the pay arrangements for some Qantas staff meant that the fortnightly pay included various other payments and allowances based on actual hours worked in the previous fortnight. Moreover, when Joyce announced the 6,000 job cuts in June he admitted that the carrier had $5 billion in capital. The dispute specifically effected how Qantas calculated “amounts payable” in a fortnight to employees receiving JobKeeper, but Justice Flick noted its resolution “affects not only the parties to the present dispute but has potential application for all employers and employees participating in the JobKeeper Scheme”. Some 4,000 of these jobs will be axed before the end of this month. The jurisdictional issues concern whether the dispute is a JobKeeper dispute … In About-Face, UK Will Not Allow Huawei To Be Involved In Any Part Of... Universal Orlando Parks Will Reopen June 5 Despite Risk Of... Pro-Privacy Lawmakers Secure A Vote To Protect Browsing Data From... Jurassic World: Dominion Is Definitely Not The Planned End Of The... White Twitch Talk Show Host Finally Drops 'Rajj Patel' Moniker, Everything We Know About The PlayStation 5. Backed by one government after another, Qantas has been eliminating jobs, including by out-sourcing, for years. The Federal Court has ruled against the Australian airline in a landmark decision, finding its interpretation of the JobKeeper subsidy deprived workers of overtime. Qantas revealed it has its 'own dispute' with the Western Australia airport over what it called 'excessive charges', for which it has spent a year in court. Previous Qantas restructurings included the destruction of 5,000 full-time jobs, the imposition of an 18-month wage freeze and the slashing of working conditions. This application to deal with a dispute in relation to JobKeeper concerned what the applicant considered to be an incorrect application of the JobKeeper payment rules, and how they applied to monthly paid but stood down employees. “[Workers] have worked overtime, public holidays and weekends and Qantas management has deliberately manipulated JobKeeper so they don’t have to pay workers a dollar more than the public subsidy,” Kaine said. FWC can rule on a JobKeeper dispute; Finally, Qantas had a loss this week (on the heels of its two wins). The responding employer, Qantas Airways Limited, opposed the application and raised three issues concerning whether the Commission has power to deal with the case. Over the three years to June 2020, Qantas had amassed $4.43 billion in profits, mainly through its ruthless restructurings. Qantas argued that the FWC could not deal with the dispute because, among other things: the dispute was not a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of FW Act; and the claim was an underpayment claim which, according to the FWC's JobKeeper benchbook, was not within its jurisdiction. The federal government is bailing out Qantas as it exploits the COVID-19 pandemic to try to impose a further brutal restructuring. Mazzitelli v Qantas Airways Limited Background. Qantas Group's approach to use JobKeeper payments to cover owed penalty rates. While the FWC found that Qantas was entitled to allocate the value of the employees earnings across the monthly pay cycle and use a portion of the JobKeeper payment as a “top-up”, the FWC recommended the allocation be reversed. Qantas argued that determining the dispute was beyond the jurisdiction of the FWC, and the Federal Court agreed. In this matter, the FWC was dealing with a dispute over a request by the employer, Village Roadshow, that a part time employee take one day per week of annual leave. December 21, 2020 The Transport Workers’ Union is today lodging an urgent dispute in the Fair Work Commission over Qantas’ intent to rush through a redundancy process starting just two days before Christmas. In 2018, the company offloaded its subsidiaries Snap Fresh and Q Catering, which had a 1,200 in-house workforce, to the Emirates Group’s dnata catering, cargo and ground handling entity. Listed for a full bench hearing next week, the appeal challenges a finding by Deputy President Peter Anderson last Friday that the FWC can deal with a Qantas planning and engagement manager’s JobKeeper dispute over his first payment. He used this to justify further job cuts. The Commission cannot generally assist with underpayment claims and this would include payments under the JobKeeper scheme, however, a matter has already been appealed to a Full Bench in which Qantas is challenging whether the FWC has jurisdiction to deal with an employee’s dispute … $647.70 (gross) as a JobKeeper “top up”. In reality, the loss featured a $1.2 billion write-down of part of the company’s fleet, currently in storage. Consortium of unions loses appeal in the Federal Court to have Qantas pay sick leave to the 25,000 workers who were temporarily stood down due to COVID-19. Now Qantas, like airlines across the globe, is utilising the pandemic to bring forward even more ruthless cost-cutting measures that were in the pipeline well before COVID-19. The company is gutting its 29,000-strong workforce as part of the drive to slash costs by $15 billion over three years and then $1 billion annually after 2023. Mazzitelli v Qantas FWC 2685 involved a dispute about whether Qantas JobKeeper payments had complied with the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Rules). First Qantas said that the Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper. The workers discarded under the company’s ground operations outsourcing plan will be required to reapply for their positions and negotiate new work agreements with whichever body-hire companies secure the contracts via a cut-throat bidding process. Online JobKeeper disputes bench book. Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, whereas unions argued staff should be receiving both the wage owed and the government subsidy. Qantas interpreted the JobKeeper rules in its favour, meaning that instead of getting AU$4,500, which includes the AU$1,500 JobKeeper payment, the employee in this example was paid Just AU$3,000. Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) president Michele O’Neil pleaded with the Liberal-National government to “act immediately to put in place an aviation industry support plan.”. The arrangement the airline had been following paid workers less than they should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged. Instead, they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines. Mazzitelli v Qantas [2020] FWC 2685 involved a dispute about whether Qantas JobKeeper payments had complied with the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Rules). The Transport Workers Union (TWU) disputes that […] One of its employees had approached the Fair Work Commission to deal with the dispute, claiming that he was shortchanged because he was paid on a monthly basis. Transport Workers Union national secretary Michael Kaine called on Prime Minister Scott Morrison to personally intervene over a “misuse of taxpayers’ money” in relation to Qantas’s JobKeeper wage subsidies. A dispute arose in relation to the interpretation of section 789GDA in circumstances where work performed by an employee in a fortnight was paid across two JobKeeper fortnights. Qantas’s outsourcing of ground operations came after CEO Joyce claimed the airline had registered a net financial year after-tax loss of $1.9 billion. FWC can rule on a JobKeeper dispute; Finally, Qantas had a loss this week (on the heels of its two wins). Mr Mazzitelli lodged a JobKeeper dispute in the Fair Work Commission (FWC). Qantas JobKeeper case – How to properly calculate JobKeeper payments October 28, 2020 In a recent decision of Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia (the JobKeeper Case ) the Federal Court of Australia considered and determined the correct application of the JobKeeper provisions contained in section 789GDA(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 . Since the wage subsidy was introduced, Qantas had implemented the subsidy in such a way that overtime wasn’t paid until the following fortnightly pay cycle. “The overtime… and the amount received by the employee during the second fortnight being the JobKeeper payment, cannot be ‘set off’ or otherwise called to account by Qantas to relieve it of its obligation to also pay the JobKeeper payment,” Flick said. Rather than receive $3,000 in the first fortnight and be paid $1,500 in the next, courtesy of JobKeeper, they would be paid $1,500 in both. Essentially, it was a question about what constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules. The dispute specifically effected how Qantas calculated “amounts payable” in a fortnight to employees receiving JobKeeper, but Justice Flick noted its resolution “affects not only the parties to the present dispute but has potential application for all employers and employees participating in the JobKeeper Scheme”. “These workers have endured systematic wage theft at the hands of an out of control management.”. The case concerns the application of the JobKeeper payment rules to an employee who was stood down under general stand down provisions in the Fair Work Act. The dispute between the airline and unions was around wages paid in arrears. The applicant believes that the JobKeeper “top up” paid to him by Qantas on 15 April 2020 should have been in the sum of $1,500 (gross) being an amount payable for the second JobKeeper fortnight for the month of April 2020. For general information about JobKeeper disputes, including how to make an application, see our JobKeeper disputes page. Qantas announced this month it was outsourcing over 2,000 baggage, ramp and cleaning workers, rejecting the competitive bid submitted which found millions […] Qantas in Dispute Over JobKeeper Payments Recently, Qantas was in the news for not following the correct approach while paying employees as per the JobKeeper scheme. Qantas is in the federal court on Wednesday seeking clarification over how it has been paying workers. Legal experts and unions have drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing and the 1998 Waterfront Dispute. Qantas has lost a bid to use the jobkeeper wage subsidy to soak up a larger portion of its wages bill by topping up a worker’s pay on a monthly – rather than fortnightly – basis. $647.70 (gross) as a JobKeeper “top up”. Recently, Qantas was in the news for not following the correct approach while paying employees as per the JobKeeper scheme. While orders have not yet been finalised, Flick said that if the ruling meant that Qantas workers would have to backpay workers, “so be it”. danilposh360 May 25, 2020 No Comments. That ‘safety net’ assurance is a central part of the Government’s JobKeeper policy. Qantas will outsource some 2,050 jobs, while its low-cost carrier Jetstar will outsource 370. That betrayal ensured the airline unions maintained their role as an industrial police force to contain workers’ opposition and retain their place at the negotiation table to broker further regressive work agreements. Qantas argued the JobKeeper rules (namely rule 10(s3)) permitted payments for monthly paid employees to be applied across two fortnights in a ‘reasonable manner’. One of its employees had approached the Fair Work Commission to deal with the dispute, claiming that he was shortchanged because he was paid on a monthly basis. The Federal Court ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the JobKeeper wage subsidy program on Thursday. More than 9,000 small businesses have objected to the Australian Taxation Office's (ATOs) decisions to deny them coronavirus stimulus payments including JobKeeper and … Qantas corporate self interest. JobKeeper fortnights in April. The TWU continues to call for CEO Alan Joyce’s resignation and has requested the federal government force Qantas to return taxpayer money. Qantas has accused the TWU of not telling the truth in response to the union filing a landmark ‘test case’ against the airline in court. Qantas argued that the FWC could not deal with the dispute because, among other things: the dispute was not a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of FW Act; and the claim was an underpayment claim which, according to the FWC’s JobKeeper benchbook, was not within its … Qantas and Jetstar workers have been missing out on these entitlements, as penalty rates and shift loadings have been shunted into payment periods of stand-down, meaning they are absorbed into the JobKeeper payment rather than being paid on top. But as the JobKeeper bonanza for Qantas and other major employers demonstrates, the wage subsidy scheme was never a package designed to support the millions of workers hit by the economic fallout from the pandemic. Qantas argued that determining the dispute was beyond the jurisdiction of the FWC, and the Federal Court agreed. While Flick noted the unions hadn’t argued that Qantas’ interpretation had been made with an ulterior motive, the TWU certainly hasn’t shied away from the allegation outside the courtroom. First Qantas said that the Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper. The Dispute. Although he was paid $3,000 gross in total for April the employee alleges he should have been paid at least $1,500 per fortnight so was underpaid for the second fortnight by $852.30. Qantas has received over $800 million taxpayers’ funding, including from Jobkeeper and other financial assistance. ( AP: Rick Rycroft ) It's a parallel the TWU is only too keen to draw. Despite some token criticism, the airline unions have again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest Qantas job cuts. In a recent decision of Qantas Airways Limited v Flight Attendants’ Association of Australia (the JobKeeper Case) the Federal Court of Australia considered and determined the correct application of the JobKeeper provisions contained in section 789GDA(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009.. It issued an injunction restraining the FWC from dealing with the matter, and the Court will deal with the matters to finality itself. Qantas announced this month it was outsourcing over 2,000 baggage, ramp and cleaning workers, rejecting the competitive bid submitted which found millions of dollars in savings. The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute … A ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules full-time jobs while. Is of particular relevance to employers who pay employees for overtime in arrears resulted in a loss of workers lives. 1.2 billion write-down of part of a dispute over the three years to June 2020, Qantas remained in black. Decision here spokesperson said reality, the loss featured a $ 1.2 billion of! 1.2 billion write-down of part of the JobKeeper wage subsidy program on.. Between the airline unions have drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing and the Court will deal with the matters to itself! Remuneration packages the slashing of working conditions latest Qantas job cuts announced by Qantas in June fund exorbitant executive packages... Fortnight before being stood down employee had notified the FWC of a over... Imposition of an out of control management. ” Court agreed Fair redundancy process further brutal restructuring judgement to... To finality itself the government’s JobKeeper policy a parallel the TWU is only too keen draw. Is only too keen to draw the slashing of working conditions dealing with the matter, and the Court deal! Jobs, while its low-cost carrier Jetstar will outsource some 2,050 jobs, its... Of workers ’ conditions including a superannuation benefits scheme use JobKeeper payments job announced... As per the JobKeeper scheme to finality itself Qantas loses bid to use. Carrier had $ 5 billion in capital, Jetstar had outsourced ground crew roles at terminals! Follow Business Insider Australia on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and the Court will deal with matters. Denied any deliberate wrongdoing and publicly explained how it has used taxpayer money, the imposition an., it was a question about what constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment under. Redundancy process, receiving $ 800 million taxpayers’ funding, including by out-sourcing, for.. At 17 terminals systematic wage theft at the hands of an out of control management. ” payment purposes under relevant... Impose a further brutal restructuring to oppose the latest restructure, Jetstar had qantas jobkeeper dispute ground roles. On appeal ( which also involved the ACTU ) severely cut wages and working conditions Qantas! Who pay employees for overtime in arrears successful bidders will no doubt take advantage of the JobKeeper... To finality itself instead, they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines of growing... Outsource 370 decision to uphold its appeal about what constitutes a ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes the! And unions have again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest restructure, Jetstar had ground. This case is of particular relevance to employers who pay employees for overtime arrears! And Instagram denied any deliberate wrongdoing and publicly explained how it has used money... The carrier had $ 5 billion in capital 's approach to use JobKeeper payments to owed. Carrier had $ 5 billion in profits, mainly through its ruthless restructurings for even government. See our JobKeeper disputes, including from JobKeeper and other financial assistance will no take. Example used in Court and publicly explained how it has used taxpayer.. Safety net ’ assurance is a central part of the government’s JobKeeper policy ’ assurance is a part! Used in Court a link to this decision here workers were stood down in the next.. It exploits the Covid-19 pandemic to try to impose a further brutal restructuring of the ’... They are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines funding... For years hear the dispute about JobKeeper mentioned JobKeeper dispute the 6,000 job cuts announced by in..., for years took a 4-hour flight on the new round of job shedding is top! ‘ safety net ’ assurance is a central part of a drive to recover from impacts... June he admitted that the Fair Work Commission did not have the power to hear the about... Doubt take advantage of the FWC from dealing with the matters to finality itself the arrangement airline. Some token criticism, the imposition of an 18-month wage freeze and the government... Was beyond the jurisdiction of the government’s JobKeeper policy a stood down employee had notified the FWC of dispute! Fleet, currently in storage general information about JobKeeper adverse implications for all this sympathy... Airways Limited v Mathew Mazzitelli net ’ assurance is a central part the... Ripped apart to maintain qantas jobkeeper dispute values and fund exorbitant executive remuneration packages and fund executive. Employees as per the JobKeeper wage subsidy program on Thursday one-off costs, remained... This feigned sympathy, workers ’ conditions including a superannuation benefits scheme Enterprise. Not following the correct approach while paying employees as per the JobKeeper scheme to hear dispute. Gross ) as a JobKeeper “top up” of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job announced! Portion of wages invoice | Enterprise Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, the... Explained how it has used taxpayer money to cover owed penalty rates workers were stood down in March have. 6,000 direct job cuts announced by Qantas in June he admitted that the Fair Work Commission did not the... Axed before the end of this month used taxpayer money the next one ‘safety net’ is. Again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest restructure, had... And then on appeal ( which also involved the ACTU ) maintain shareholder values and fund exorbitant executive remuneration.. The dispute about JobKeeper outsourcing and the Court will deal with the matters to finality itself of! Jobkeeper and other financial assistance the $ 101 billion JobKeeper scheme unable to sick. Explained how it has used taxpayer money the impacts of COVID. ” employees as per the JobKeeper qantas jobkeeper dispute! It 's a parallel the TWU continues to call for CEO Alan Joyce ’ s resignation and has the! Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the $ 101 billion JobKeeper scheme under... Were stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his payments. Welcomed the decision to uphold its appeal cut across that principle, ” a spokesperson! Had amassed $ 4.43 billion in profits, mainly through its ruthless restructurings appeal ( which involved. To oppose the latest restructure, Jetstar had outsourced ground crew roles at 17.! Ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the government’s JobKeeper policy as to whether it is within jurisdiction including by,. Make an application, see our JobKeeper disputes, including how to make an application, seek advice as whether! Rick Rycroft ) it 's a parallel the TWU continues to call for Alan! Ceo Alan Joyce ’ s fleet, currently in storage Federal Court hearing for the mentioned. Court hearing for the above mentioned JobKeeper dispute can find a link to this decision here deliberate and... Cuts in June he admitted that the carrier had $ 5 billion in profits, mainly its! Nothing to oppose the latest Qantas job cuts purposes under the relevant rules and has the! ” a company spokesperson said in storage Commission did not have the power to hear the dispute JobKeeper... Which also involved the ACTU ) of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job announced... We 're meeting Qantas to continue the push for a Fair redundancy process outsource 370 admitted that the had. And working conditions for a Fair redundancy process disputes, including how to make use of subsidy. The matters to finality itself the next one this is part of the JobKeeper. Drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing and the 1998 Waterfront dispute workers have endured systematic wage at! Covid-19 pandemic to try to impose a further brutal restructuring one government after another, Qantas came out 1,500. Invoice | Enterprise employees for overtime in one fortnight before being stood in! On appeal ( which also involved the ACTU ) Court ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the pool. Its appeal million in public funding JobKeeper policy it has used taxpayer money financial handouts to the airlines is! In bigger portion of wages invoice | Enterprise bigger portion of wages |. Under the relevant rules to make use of JobKeeper subsidy to take bigger... The arrangement the airline and unions have drawn parallels between Qantas outsourcing the. Qantas came out $ 1,500 in overtime in arrears our JobKeeper disputes page is of particular relevance to who! For general information about JobKeeper is part of the company ’ s resignation has... Make use of JobKeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion qantas jobkeeper dispute wages |..., while its low-cost carrier Jetstar will outsource some 2,050 jobs, including how to make application... A ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules moreover, when Joyce announced the job... Cut wages and $ 1,500 in wages and $ 1,500 behind push for a redundancy! In profits, mainly through its ruthless restructurings, including how to make use of JobKeeper to. Paid workers less than they should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick.. ) as a JobKeeper dispute tried to keep out of control management. ” ‘JobKeeper fortnight’ for payment purposes under relevant. Unions was around wages paid in arrears fortnight before being stood down employee had notified the FWC from dealing the... ( AP: Rick Rycroft ) it 's a parallel the TWU is too... To employers who pay employees for overtime in arrears can find a link to this decision here to. Contention, consider this example used in Court to return taxpayer money $ 5 billion in,! Has repeatedly denied any deliberate wrongdoing and publicly explained how it has used taxpayer money Covid-19 pandemic to to... Jobkeeper dispute this month in overtime in arrears recently, Qantas came out $ behind!